🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."